FSB delays due to asset managersâ concerns
07 August 2015 Basel
Image: Shutterstock
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has decided to delay finalising the assessment methodologies for non-bank, non-insurer global systemically important financial institutions (NBNI G-SIFIs).
The FSB wants to wait until its work on financial stability risks from asset management activities is completed.
The G20 body published its second consultative document on NBNI G-SIFI methodologies in March, setting a deadline of 29 May for industry feedback.
It received around 50 comments, largely on how the methodologies would treat asset management activities.
Many asset manager firms appeared to crticise the FSB, with Fidelity saying in its comment letter: âInvestment funds and asset managers do not, and cannot, present the type and scale of risk required to justify a G-SIFI designation.â
âAnd even if a single fund or manager were capable of presenting that kind of risk to the global financial system, designation would not effectively address the risk.â
The FSB has taken particular issue with âshadow bankingâ activities such as securities lending and repo, which asset managers engage in to boost returns.
âThe significant number of funds available to investors, the intense competition in the industry and the high degree of substitution, mean that particular activities (eg, securities lending, repo, etc) are not limited to a small subset of the largest funds, but, rather, are conducted by a host of funds and other market participants.â
âIf the goal is to reduce risk across the global financial system, then regulators must deal with the activities that create that risk consistently across the system. Regulators must restrict those activities not only across all funds, but across all market participants.â
Going on to defends its securities lending activities, Fidelity said that its mutual funds âengage in securities lending to a limited extentâ, and its securities lending programmes âdo not pose material investment risk to the funds, let alone the financial stability of the USâ.
The FSB said more time will âallow further analysis of potential financial stability issues associated with asset management entities and activities to inform the revised assessment methodologyâ.
It will report on its work to the G20 countries later this year and plans to develop âactivities-based policy recommendationsâ by the spring of 2016.
The FSB wants to wait until its work on financial stability risks from asset management activities is completed.
The G20 body published its second consultative document on NBNI G-SIFI methodologies in March, setting a deadline of 29 May for industry feedback.
It received around 50 comments, largely on how the methodologies would treat asset management activities.
Many asset manager firms appeared to crticise the FSB, with Fidelity saying in its comment letter: âInvestment funds and asset managers do not, and cannot, present the type and scale of risk required to justify a G-SIFI designation.â
âAnd even if a single fund or manager were capable of presenting that kind of risk to the global financial system, designation would not effectively address the risk.â
The FSB has taken particular issue with âshadow bankingâ activities such as securities lending and repo, which asset managers engage in to boost returns.
âThe significant number of funds available to investors, the intense competition in the industry and the high degree of substitution, mean that particular activities (eg, securities lending, repo, etc) are not limited to a small subset of the largest funds, but, rather, are conducted by a host of funds and other market participants.â
âIf the goal is to reduce risk across the global financial system, then regulators must deal with the activities that create that risk consistently across the system. Regulators must restrict those activities not only across all funds, but across all market participants.â
Going on to defends its securities lending activities, Fidelity said that its mutual funds âengage in securities lending to a limited extentâ, and its securities lending programmes âdo not pose material investment risk to the funds, let alone the financial stability of the USâ.
The FSB said more time will âallow further analysis of potential financial stability issues associated with asset management entities and activities to inform the revised assessment methodologyâ.
It will report on its work to the G20 countries later this year and plans to develop âactivities-based policy recommendationsâ by the spring of 2016.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities AVŔÇ Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities AVŔÇ Times
